Understand before changing
We look at the code, database and deployment path before proposing a route. The useful question is what needs to change and what your business can safely keep using.
Inspect firstYour PHP platform needs to keep running while your team handles new features and maintenance. Fuse Web brings senior PHP engineers alongside your team, with Dutch guidance and development from Athens. We look at the code and how you work before recommending what to take on. Then we agree the responsibilities and a useful first step.
The next feature still matters. So do the dependency update, the slow query and the release only one person understands.
We look at the code, database and deployment path before proposing a route. The useful question is what needs to change and what your business can safely keep using.
Inspect firstYou can discuss a technical decision with the senior people involved in the work. We explain trade-offs in terms of delivery, maintenance and risk, including when we think a different approach makes more sense.
Direct accessVisible changes and documented decisions help your team understand what has changed. We agree how code review, checks and handover fit your repository, and whether ongoing care belongs in the scope.
Clear ownershipYou know the business and its priorities. We bring senior PHP experience to the work you need to move forward. We agree who decides, who implements and who reviews, using your existing workflow where it fits.
Our Dutch-Greek setup gives you direct contact with the engineers involved. Pull requests and review make progress visible; documented technical decisions give your team something it can use after the work is finished.
The roles shown here illustrate how work can be divided, not a fixed team size. Before starting, we agree the people involved, access, working cadence and responsibilities for releases and support.
Tell us what is blocked and what must keep running. We need that context before discussing a useful scope or start date.
Talk with the founder about your system, your team and the work that is not moving. We assess whether team extension fits, or whether the problem needs a different approach.
For substantial or unclear work, agree an assessment of the codebase, database and deployment setup. The written plan identifies what to change, what to leave alone, the risks and the first useful milestone.
Confirm who will do the work, the required access and environments, and who owns review and releases. Timing depends on that preparation, the technical fit and available capacity. Start with the agreed milestone and make progress visible.
Review the work against the milestone and discuss what we have learned. Document the implementation and deployment decisions, then agree the next scope, a handover or ongoing maintenance.
A historical case of application and database work, with support for the existing system while its replacement was being built.
A custom PHP auction platform faced stability and maintainability problems as traffic grew. Its application structure made further development difficult.
The platform was rebuilt using PHP and Zend Framework, with MariaDB, Redis and HAProxy in the stack. The frontend accessed data through an API. Alongside the rebuild, we supported the operational teams maintaining the existing system.
The published case reports improved stability under heavy traffic and a structure that made further feature development easier. Work on the application continued after the initial deployment.
We use hourly or project-based pricing, depending on the work and delivery model. Scope, technical risk and the involvement your team needs determine the proposal.
For larger or unclear work, scope the assessment first. That gives us a basis for discussing implementation effort and a useful first milestone. We agree pricing and responsibilities before the relevant work starts.
When your team has an application to maintain and improve, but needs senior help with the work. That might mean clearing a feature backlog, upgrading legacy PHP or investigating performance problems. We first look at whether working alongside your team fits the problem, or whether a scoped assessment or project would be more useful.
You set the business priorities. Together we agree who owns technical decisions, implementation, review and releases. We take responsibility for the work we agree to do and raise risks when we find them. If you also need technical leadership, we discuss that explicitly rather than assuming your team can provide it.
Existing systems are a core part of our work: Laravel, Symfony, Zend/Laminas and custom PHP, with the databases and deployment setup around them. We inspect the codebase and its constraints before recommending changes. An older framework does not automatically mean you need a rewrite.
Fuse Web combines Dutch guidance with senior engineering from Athens. You have a direct line to the people involved in your application. We agree the working language, meeting cadence, working hours and how to raise urgent issues for your engagement.
We discuss the technical fit, scope, available capacity and access needed, then agree a realistic first milestone and timing. For unclear or high-risk work, that may be a scoped assessment and written plan. Responsibilities, pricing and any handover or ongoing-care arrangement are agreed for the engagement.
Tell us about the system, the work that is blocked and what must keep running. A first conversation with the founder helps establish whether we can help and what needs a closer look.